Archive for the ‘G-WARMING’ category

Web Hosting Geeks

January 17th, 2010

In our experience of having a hosting for our website or blog, we do need a great hosting, especially if you are serious about your web. You need a reasonable price, many options for all we need, and a great support too! How a bout a free domain included on the service? That should be not bad right? Now, what we need is not just some recommendation. We know all of us might be a web hosting geek and we would want to compare it our-self. By reading  all the of the web hosting company profile, all the services that they offer to us, and in the end, we will use one or some of them for our needs.

Do not think about anything yet, don’t be discourage about the time that you have to spend on comparing all the web hosting companies. Not mentioning that we might not know what are those hostings available out there. One other great features on Web Hosting Geeks is the option to have multiple domain hosting and the Green Web Hosting. For all of our readers who also have a concern about our green planet. It is totally recommended to choose the green web hosting company. They way a lot of company preserve their energy, they do extra effort is what we value the most. I think I don’t need to explain more about what kind of green things that they do. You all know about that, and if you need more info, just visit their website on:

Webhostinggeeks.com (Web Hosting Geeks – website hosting reviews and web host rating)

Nashville Garage Door Specialist

July 16th, 2009

Listing Photo

When we talk about the design of our house, we might forget about the importance of a garage door. But if we driver around a good neighborhood, we can see some estate actually put a lot of money on their garage. We might think that it is not important, but a garage actually take quite a lot of percentage of our frontal home design, especially if we have a double car space garage.

If you live in Nashville, a garagedoor company really cares about their quickness of service, precision, quality, and the best value price compared to any other company. Call Nashville Garage Door and never hesitate to ask them about the estimation for the best garage door. People with minor repair on their existing garage, don’t pay too much for a small fix.

Some testimonial from the previous customer of Nashville Garage Door Tennessee told us that he could not figure out how to fix the garage door, but Nashville Garage Door fix it in only 35 minutes and the best thing is also with a cheaper price. Their great customer service and their consistency to do an excellent work are their best output that you can expect. Get their slogan and promo:

No Service Call Charges – Free Estimates – Honest, Quality Service At An Affordable Price.

Visit them now!

Global environmental change

July 11th, 2009
Impacts of global environmental changes

Large-scale and global environmental hazards to human health include climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, loss of biodiversity, changes in hydrological systems and the supplies of freshwater, land degradation and stresses on food-producing systems.

Appreciation of this scale and type of influence on human health requires a new perspective which focuses on ecosystems and on the recognition that the foundations of long-term good health in populations rely in great part on the continued stability and functioning of the biosphere’s life-supporting systems. It also brings an appreciation of the complexity of the systems upon which we depend.

environmental change and health interlinkages

Recycle (3)

April 22nd, 2009

With more European governments driving recycling initiatives, it is becoming easier for everyone to recycle. Learn new and easy ways to dispose of waste as well as how to choose products and packaging that have less of an impact on the environment.

  • Bring used glass to the bottle bank and sort paper and cardboard, plastics and cans from the rest of your waste. Recycling one aluminium can saves 90% of the energy needed to produce a new one – 9kg of CO2 emissions per kilogramme of aluminium! For 1kg of recycled plastics, the saving is 1.5kg of CO2; for 1kg of recycled glass, it is 300gr of CO2; and recycling 1kg of paper instead of landfilling it avoids 900gr of CO2 emissions as well as methane emissions.
  • Reduce waste. Most products we buy cause greenhouse gas emissions in one or another way, e.g. during production and distribution. By taking your lunch in a reusable lunch box instead of a disposable one, you save the energy needed to produce new lunch boxes.
  • Reuse your shopping bag. When shopping, it saves energy and waste to use a reusable bag instead of accepting a disposable one in each shop. Waste not only discharges CO2 and methane into the atmosphere, it can also pollute the air, groundwater and soil.

    One bottle of 1.5l requires less energy and produces less waste than three bottles of 0.5l.

  • Choose products that come with little packaging and buy refills when you can – you will also cut down on waste production and energy use!
  • Buy intelligently: one bottle of 1.5l requires less energy and produces less waste than three bottles of 0.5l.
  • Recycle your organic waste. Landfills account for around 3% of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions through the methane released by decomposing bio-degradable waste. By recycling organic waste or composting it if you have a garden, you can help eliminate this problem! Just make sure that you compost it properly, so it decomposes with sufficient oxygen, otherwise your compost will cause methane emissions and smell foul.
  • Print less!
    At the office, encourage your colleagues to re-use the other side of paper and print less by archiving their emails and attachments. You can also try and create paperless habits. Some studies show that office paper consumption is rising by 20 % per year and web-based technology is actually increasing the printing of documents. On average each worker uses about 50 sheets of A4 per day. Must you print?
  • Get a mug!
    Invest in your own office coffee mug instead of using disposable plastic or paper cups. If you drink two coffees a day, you would be saving approximately 400 plastic cups in one year.
  • Buy a ‘recyclable’ Christmas tree!
    If you buy a Christmas tree, buy one with roots so that you can keep it watered. When Christmas is over you can plant it in the garden. If you buy a cut tree, recycle it by having it collected by your local authorities.
  • Say no to paper towels!
    A mop or sponge will do an even better job at cleaning up a spill so why waste paper? Reduce your waste and you’ll help trees.
  • Say no to plastic or paper bags!
    The plastic bags you use but for a few minutes can last for as long as 15 to 1,000 years in the environment. Don’t get a new plastic bag each time you go shopping. Get a funky re-useable or cotton bag instead and say ‘no thanks’ to plastic or paper bags.
  • Don’t litter!
    Avoid disposing any waste on the streets, in nature, and especially not in the gutter. This rubbish can end up in the water treatment system and overcharge the decontamination process. Take advantage of city waste baskets. They are everywhere and that’s what they are for.
  • Need new glasses?
    Around 10 million pairs of usable spectacles are discarded each year in Europe and North America. These can be used to help people in the developing world to afford glasses. Most opticians now act as collection points for old glasses, so drop yours off and give them a new lease on life.
  • When the time comes to change your car battery, recycle your old one.
    Check with your local authorities for their advice as they might recommend that you take it to a special disposal site, or to a garage which collects them for recycling and proper disposal.
  • Donate your old clothes to charities or collection programmes.
    Your old wardrobe will be given a second life as either second-hand clothes or shredded and recycled as raw material for textiles and packaging. This will save precious energy and our scarce natural resources.
  • Dispose with care!
    Take your electronic waste to a local collection point or give it back to the retailer so that it can be treated or recycled properly. Electronic and electric appliances contain many toxic substances. Since mid 2005, all European Member States are obliged to set up take-back systems for this waste.
  • Re-use paper!
    Instead of using a fresh piece of paper for rough work, turn over a used copy and write on the other side. Use products made of recycled paper. Remember! Every ton of recycled paper saves 17 trees compared to paper made from virgin materials.

From: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/campaign/control/recycle_en.htm

Pushing back an oxygen-rich atmosphere

April 11th, 2009

Tiny crystals of iron oxide in ancient Australian rocks offer evidence that the Earth’s atmosphere held significant amounts of oxygen far earlier than previously thought, a new study suggests.

Large quantities of oxide minerals in rocks around the world indicate that the atmosphere had at least small amounts of oxygen by 2.2 billion years ago (SN: 1/24/04, p. 61). And the presence of certain biomarkers in Australian rocks has been hailed as evidence that oxygen-making organisms had evolved by 2.7 billion years ago, but recent studies have cast some doubt on that earlier date (SN: 11/22/08, p. 5).

Now, analyses of rocks laid down 3.46 billion years ago in what is now Australia push back the oxygen era even further, Hiroshi Ohmoto, a geochemist at Pennsylvania State University in University Park, and his colleagues contend online March 15 in Nature Geoscience.

Hematite, one type of iron oxide, can form in a variety of ways, only some of which require an oxygen-rich atmosphere, says Ohmoto. If ultraviolet light strikes iron hydroxide minerals, it triggers a reaction that drives away water and leaves hematite behind. In an environment that lacks UV light, however, hematite only forms via a reaction between iron and oxygen.

The team’s analyses of hematite-containing samples from Australia’s Marble Bar Chert — a rock formation in the northwestern part of the country — suggest the hematite formed deep underwater, in the absence of UV light.

The chert formation, which is between 50 and 200 meters thick and about 30 kilometers long where it’s exposed at the Earth’s surface, is sandwiched between two thick layers of volcanic rock. The cooled lavas in those adjacent formations aren’t frothy with bubbles, a sign that the two strata formed under high pressure — probably on a seafloor at least 200 meters deep, Ohmoto says. A lack of erosion in any of these strata and of signs that waves or currents disrupted the sediments that made up the chert suggest that the material accumulated in deep water, far below where ultraviolet light penetrates.

The hematite in the uppermost layers of the chert — those laid down as sediments around 3.46 billion years ago — is the key evidence for plentiful oxygen, Ohmoto says. Those particles, which in many cases clump together to form thin layers, are single crystals of the mineral, indicating that they weren’t produced by the UV-driven degradation of an iron hydroxide mineral, he notes. The team’s geochemical analyses also suggest that the crystals formed as hot, iron-rich hydrothermal fluids spewed from an ocean floor into cool oxygenated waters. The concentration of dissolved oxygen in those waters almost rivaled those found in today’s ocean deeps, the team estimates.

Rock samples from the Marble Bar Chert “are rosy red” from oxidation, says Paul Knauth, a geochemist at Arizona State University in Tempe, but the presence of other easily oxidized minerals in the same rocks — pyrites, in particular — suggests that that the hematite oxidation occurred when the rocks first formed, not millions of years later. “I’m convinced the environment there was oxygenated,” he adds.

The implications of these findings are profound: If oxygen was present in near-modern-day concentrations in such a broad and deep body of water, the atmosphere above must have been heartily oxygenated as well. Presumably that oxygen was produced by photosynthetic organisms, possibly pushing back their first appearance beyond eras when they were known to exist.

Ohmoto says that the researchers can’t yet tell whether oxygen was available worldwide or only locally at the time, or whether oxygen concentrations declined in later eras only to bounce back to modern levels millions of years later. However, Ohmoto suggests, it is “possible to have limited amounts of anoxic water in an oxygenated ocean, but it’s not really likely to have an oxygen oasis in a large, anoxic ocean.”

Knowing the movie: open the eye.

April 8th, 2009

http://www.realmovienews.com/movieimages/9344/9412/9412_749_poster_2_f.jpg

The movie definitely opening the eye for everyone else (yes, just like the phrase they use in the movie). The climate crisis and the sun will resulting a major disaster, or maybe we can say it as the end of the world. This movie takes us to a higher ground where there is no other things really matters in this mortal life. Everything just dissapear in a quick zap of fire. Hopefully we care more about the earth, not just the rio and peru people, but the whole world. To understand that the greatest power of GOD is the power of all. Keep our earth green!

Ice shelf split in Antarctica a sign of global warming

April 7th, 2009

The Wilkins Ice Shelf off the Antarctic Peninsula is seen breaking up January 18, 2009. The huge Antarctic ice shelf is on the brink of collapse with just a sliver of ice holding it in place, the latest victim of global warming that is altering maps of the frozen continent. (Xinhua/Reuters Photo)

WELLINGTON, April 6 — An ice shelf that is wrenching itself away from Antarctica is a symptom of global warming and will have further environmental consequences, according to a New Zealand scientist.

A satellite picture showed that a 40-km-long strip of ice believed to pin the Wilkins Ice Shelf in place has snapped at its narrowest point, off the Antarctic Peninsula.

Professor Tim Naish from the Antarctic Research Center at Victoria University in Wellington said it was the ice sheets behind the ice shelf that concern him and other scientists, Radio New Zealand reported on Monday.

The ice bridge had held a vast Antarctic ice shelf in place for hundreds of years.

Naish said the shelf measures about 14,000 square km and as the ice shelves melt, the ice sheets start sliding faster into the ocean.

Researchers regarded the ice bridge as an important barrier to holding the remnant shelf structure in place.

Scientists said the collapse provides further evidence or rapid change in the region.

The loss of the ice bridge, which was almost 100 km wide in 1950, could allow ocean currents to wash away more of the shelf.

Temperatures on the Antarctic Peninsula have risen by up to about 3 degrees Celsius in the past 50 years, the fastest rate of warming in the Southern Hemisphere.

Nine other shelves have receded or collapsed around the Antarctic Peninsula in the past 50 years.


Global Warming: Early Warning Signs

March 25th, 2009
Early Global Warming Signs

Early Global Warming Signs

The people of South America are heavily dependent on the continent’s natural resources—from the rangelands at the foothills of the Andes, to the plants and animals of the Amazon rainforest, to the fisheries off the coast of Peru. The region’s ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to the changes in water availability expected with a changing climate. Higher global temperatures along with more frequent El Ni’os may bring increased drought, and melting glaciers in the Andes threaten the future water supply of mountain communities. Signs of a warming climate have already appeared both at high elevations—in glacial retreat and shifting ranges of disease-carrying mosquitoes—and along the coast—in rising sea level and coral bleaching.
Fingerprints
45. Recife, Brazil — Sea-level rise. Shoreline receded more than 6 feet (1.8 m) per year from 1915 to 1950 and more than 8 feet (2.4 m) per year from 1985 to 1995. The dramatic land loss was due to a combination of sea-level rise and loss of sediment supply following dam construction, harbor dredging, and other coastal engineering projects.
64. Andes Mountains, Peru — Glacial retreat accelerates seven-fold. The edge of the Qori Kalis glacier was retreating 13 feet (4.0 m) annually between 1963 and 1978. By 1995, the rate had stepped up to 99 feet (30.1 m) per year.
92. Chiclayo, Peru – Large increase in average minimum temperatures. Average minimum temperatures along Peru’s north coast increased 3.5°F (2°C) from the 1960s to 2000. The temperature in the high plateau region in extreme southeastern Peru has also risen 3.5°F (2°C), from an average of 48°F (9°C) in the 1960s to 52°F (11°C) in 2001. Northwestern South America has warmed by 0.8-1.4°F (0.5-0.8 °C) in the last decade of the 20th century.
101. Tropical Andes (Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and northernmost Chile) – Increase in average annual temperature. Average annual temperature has increased by about 0.18°F (0.1°C) per decade since 1939. The rate of warming has doubled in the last 40 years, and more than tripled in the last 25 years, to about 0.6°F (0.33°C) per decade.
128. Argentina – Receding glaciers. Glaciers in Patagonia have receded by an average of almost a mile (1.5 km) over the last 13 years. There has been an increase in maximum, minimum, and average daily temperatures of more than 1.8°F (1°C) over the past century in southern Patagonia, east of the Andes.
132. Venezuela – Disappearing glaciers. Of six glaciers in the Venezuelan Andes in 1972, only 2 remain, and scientists predict that these will be gone within the next 10 years. Glaciers in the mountains of Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru show similar rapid rates of retreat. Temperature records in other regions of the Andes show a significant warming of about 0.6° F (0.33°C) per decade since the mid-1970s.

Harbingers
15. Andes Mountains, Columbia — Disease-carrying mosquitoes spreading. Aedes aegypti mosquitoes that can carry dengue and yellow fever viruses were previously limited to 3,300 feet (1,006 m) but recently appeared at 7,200 feet (2,195 m).
36. Monteverde Cloud Forest, Costa Rica — Disappearing frogs and toads. A reduction in dry-seson mists due to warmer Pacific ocean temperatures has beenlinked to disappearances of 20 species of frogs and toads, upward shifts in the ranges of mountain birds, and declines in lizard populations.
47. Pacific Ocean, Panama — Coral reef bleaching.
53. Caribbean — Coral reeef bleaching.
58. Galapagos — Coral reef bleaching.
86. Nicaragua — 2.2 million acres (890,308 hectares) burned, 1998. Over 15,000 fires burned in 1998, and the blazing acreage included protected lands in the Bosawas Biosphere Reserve.
117. Argentine Islands – Antarctic flowering plants changes. The populations of two native Antarctic flowering plants increased rapidly between 1964 and 1990, coincident with the strong regional warming over the Antarctic Peninsula. The Antarctic pearlwort population increased 5-fold while the Antarctic hairgrass increased 25-fold. The unusually rapid increases are attributed to warmer summer temperatures and/or a longer growing season, which enhance the plant’s ability to reproduce.
125. Galapagos, Ecuador – Coral reef bleaching, March/April 2002. Sea-surface temperatures rose above 81.5 °F (27.5°C) several times, causing repeated coral bleaching events. Repeated and prolonged bleaching episodes – expected as tropical water temperatures warm with climate change – eventually kill corals and cause a decline in associated marine species.
143. Pampas region, Argentina/Uruguay – Worst flooding on record, August to October 2001. Nearly 8 million acres (3.2 million hectares) of land in the Pampas region were flooded after 3 months of high rainfall. Mean annual precipiation in the humid Pampa increased by 35% in the last half of the 20th century.
145. Buenos Aires, Argentina – Heaviest rains in 100 years, May 2000. 13.5 inches (34.2 cm) of rain, more than 4 times the average monthly rainfall, fell in just 5 days. Northeastern Argentina is exhibiting a long-term trend of increasing precipitation.
146. Venezuela – Heaviest rainfall in 100 years, December 1999. The heaviest rainfall in 100 years caused massive landslides and flooding that killed approximately 30,000 people. Total December rainfall in Maiquetia, near Caracas, was almost 4 feet (1.2 m), more than 5 times the previous December record. The high death toll was attributed to population growth in vulnerable areas and forest clearing on steep hill slopes.
153. Argentina – Fire outbreak. 3.7 million acres (1.5 million hectares) burned in La Pampa province, sustained by record temperatures and persistent drought. Annual average temperature in Argentina has increased by nearly 1.8°F (1°C) over the last century.

Global Warming Costs

January 3rd, 2009

Energy Needs v. Global Warming Goals

Leading climate alarmists claim that global greenhouse gas emissions need to decrease to 60 percent below present levels by 2050 if humans are to avoid catastrophic climate change. But such a drastic emissions reduction is at odds with the world’s energy needs. Economists predict that an 80 percent increase in global energy demand will cause global greenhouse gas emissions to grow by 70 percent by mid-century.

CO2 Emissions by Region

CO2 Emissions by Region

Almost all the increase in energy demand and emissions will come from developing countries, where a quarter of the global population lacks any access to electricity. Indeed, almost half of the world’s people have to rely on traditional biomass, agricultural residues, and dung for cooking and heating. These countries will require tremendous amounts of energy if they are to grow their economies and escape poverty.

Given the reality of increasing energy demand in the developing world, the only way to reduce emissions is de-carbonize energy production. Yet fossil fuels account for 85 percent of the world’s primary energy for a very simple reason: They are the world’s least expensive source of energy. Therefore, a carbon-free energy future is an expensive energy future.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, annual global greenhouse gas emissions need to be reduced by 30.3 gigatons a year by 2050 to reduce emissions by 50 percent by 2050. To get an idea of the costs of de-carbonizing energy production, consider the chart below, which depicts actions that would “save” 1 gigaton of CO2-equivalent per year:

Actions that Provide One Gigaton CO2 per Year of Mitigation or Offsets

Actions that Provide One Gigaton CO2 per Year of Mitigation or Offsets

Someone would have to pay for all those new nuclear power plants and wind turbines. The International Energy Agency estimates that halving global emissions by 2050 would cost $45 trillion. That is $45 trillion above the cost of fossil fuel energy that would not be spent to create wealth. That would take a big bite out of global prosperity. Much is said about the so-called “consensus” on climate science, but the economic consensus is that reducing emissions reduces economic growth.

Making energy more expensive would be catastrophic for the developing world, for which access to affordable energy is a precondition for economic growth, the most important driver of human well-being. Costly emissions reductions policies would rob the world’s poorest people of opportunities to escape poverty.

Alarmists claim that rising temperatures threaten human welfare—but reducing emissions from energy production also threatens human welfare, especially in the developing world, since doing so limits economic growth. So what is worse, the warming or the policy?

The question we have to ask is, “What’s Worse? Climate change or climate policy?”

In a Cato Institute study, Indur Goklany suggests that climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem during the 21st century, because a richer but warmer world is better for human welfare than a colder but poorer world would be.

The Cost of Global Warming

The Cost of Global Warming

In his book Cool It, Danish statistician Bjørn Lomborg applies a cost/benefit analysis to climate change mitigation measures like the Kyoto Protocol, and finds that they are a tragic waste of money. According to his research, we could spend a fraction of the cost of climate policies on immediate problems, like HIV or malaria, and save millions more lives than global warming would take.

Dr. William Nordhaus of Yale University estimates that 3°C of global warming would cost the world $22 trillion this century. Al Gore’s package of measures, which calls on the U.S. to “join an international treaty within the next two years that cuts global warming pollution by 90 percent in developed countries and by more than half worldwide in time for the next generation to inherit a healthy Earth,” would reduce warming costs to $10 trillion, at a cost of $34 trillion.

Climate change might harm human welfare, but so would climate change policy. Policy makers should assess and weigh both sets of risks before deciding on a course of action.

Solutions to the energy crisis / Global Warming problem

December 15th, 2008

We face an energy crisis, since gas and oil resources are diminishing this century. Oil and gas production follow a bell-curve, and around the middle of the depletion of a gas or oil field, the production of that field decreases yearly.

Apart from coal (for producing electricity) and nuclear energy, there aren’t reasonable alternatives which can be utilized at this large scale and at the same costs. But both coal and nuclear power have their drawbacks.
[ Although energy from coal might be produced in a clean(er) way, in which the carbon-dioxide is not emitted in the atmosphere but stored under ground. ]

We have to take into account that the use of energy per capita is still significantly growing (for example: China, India), and also the population still grows enormously (doubles every 25 years).

So what to do?

There are of course alternatives. Utilizing sun energy, wind, tidal, geothermic and bio energy, which in principle are renewable.
The only problem is: in general they aren’t available in the scale and concentration in which it is needed and/or are much more expensive.

However, the costs for (for instance) producing electricity is rising and might even rise more when we near peakoil scenario, and at the same time techniques for producing large scale wind or sun energy, are decreasing.

When wind and/or sun energy are produced at much larger scales, it becomes economically feasable, even when the energy has to be transported far away (as electricity or hydrogen).

For example, large parts of earth which are now uninhabited (the deserts) could become economic production centers for producing solar energy.
At a sufficient large scale, solar energy can become as cheap as other forms of energy. The extra costs for distribution for a long range (energy losses) also included. Also, energy could be distributed as hydrogen, for other uses.
Secondly, these deserts when sea water is desalinated could also become productive agricultural regions (in a long time, before the soil is improved, starting with plants that use little water and help other vegetation to survive), and hence, these kind of production facilities, on a sufficient large scale, could signicantly reduce green house gas emissions.

Of course, this could be only feasable in the long run, when price leves of conventional energy resources are significantly higher, and prices of large scale solar energy production systems are significantly lower.
But in some decades, this will most probably the case. And maybe even earlier, if we decide to boost this development (on an international/global level) with some inititial large scale investments.
What would be needed for that is creating some fund (in the form of some extra energy tax or CO2 emission tax, paid by the rich and energy consuming countries).
Extra benefits are: this will also help increase development of developing countries, for example, (sub) sahara countries, it would create many jobs and stabilize immigration levels to europe, etc. And most importantly: it will provide drinking water for millions of people in that region, who now face the problems of water shortages, which to them is a bigger problem then energy shortages.
Other regions which could be developed in this manner: large part of the middle east and arabian peninsula, large part of west china and surrounding regions, australian inlands, south east of united states, etc. and other dry regions with a lot of sunshine.